The world seems to be more sharply divided than ever between the haves and the have nots. Wealth, opportunity, and privilege in many parts of the world, including the United States, seems to be the prerogative of a select few. Social justice on the other hand is the concept of everyone having the same access to the possibilities of wealth, opportunities, and privileges.
The idea that an open society should have the same rules for everybody is a product of the mid-eighteen hundreds. Its first appearance came during civil revolutions that rocked Europe and with the rise of the Industrial Revolution. The focus during this period was on fair distribution of wealth, property, and capital.
A hundred years later the concept began to expand. It grew to include gender, race, ethnicity, and the environment. This idea has also expanded from being the prime responsibility of governments to create an equal society into a universal concern for the condition of all victimized humans no matter where they are.
The drawbacks to establishing a truly equal society are broken down by experts into two basic parts. One is the way individuals in mainstream society treat others based only on personal bias, prejudice, fear, and misinformation. Examples of this are people who are treated unequally because of their gender, age, race, religion, social status, education, nationality, or mental and physical disabilities.
Unjust governmental laws are the second part of the equation. These are law put in place, knowingly or unknowingly, that create conditions that limit, deny, or make it hard for some segments of the population to access opportunities freely given to other segments of the population. Examples of these are voting laws that redistrict certain areas to sway elections in favor of one party and laws that require specific types of identification in order for a person to be allowed into the polling booths.
Environmental laws, or the lack thereof, that allow industries to dispose of waste in the lakes and rivers that a community relies on for drinking water is another example of governmental injustice. There are still schools in the United States that do not comply with school segregation laws. There are certain areas of America where people of a certain race or ethnic background are more likely to be pulled over by law enforcement.
In the matter of societal treatment that causes injustice, the experts break it down into the direct and indirect form. Direct inequality is the act of denying rights and opportunities to some people, but not to others. One example of direct inequality is denying individuals the right to eat in a public restaurant based solely on the sexual orientation of those individuals. Governments that segregate schools and other public facilities based on race are an example of direct inequality.
Indirect inequality is when governments put laws in place that don't directly inhibit the rights of certain individuals, but in reality do just that. Laws that limit mail in voting and require identifying documentation in order to vote are examples of indirect inequality. Purchasing clothes made in sweatshops have the effect of supporting manufacturers who victimize their workers. You are indirectly condoning this conduct by rewarding it with sales.
The idea that an open society should have the same rules for everybody is a product of the mid-eighteen hundreds. Its first appearance came during civil revolutions that rocked Europe and with the rise of the Industrial Revolution. The focus during this period was on fair distribution of wealth, property, and capital.
A hundred years later the concept began to expand. It grew to include gender, race, ethnicity, and the environment. This idea has also expanded from being the prime responsibility of governments to create an equal society into a universal concern for the condition of all victimized humans no matter where they are.
The drawbacks to establishing a truly equal society are broken down by experts into two basic parts. One is the way individuals in mainstream society treat others based only on personal bias, prejudice, fear, and misinformation. Examples of this are people who are treated unequally because of their gender, age, race, religion, social status, education, nationality, or mental and physical disabilities.
Unjust governmental laws are the second part of the equation. These are law put in place, knowingly or unknowingly, that create conditions that limit, deny, or make it hard for some segments of the population to access opportunities freely given to other segments of the population. Examples of these are voting laws that redistrict certain areas to sway elections in favor of one party and laws that require specific types of identification in order for a person to be allowed into the polling booths.
Environmental laws, or the lack thereof, that allow industries to dispose of waste in the lakes and rivers that a community relies on for drinking water is another example of governmental injustice. There are still schools in the United States that do not comply with school segregation laws. There are certain areas of America where people of a certain race or ethnic background are more likely to be pulled over by law enforcement.
In the matter of societal treatment that causes injustice, the experts break it down into the direct and indirect form. Direct inequality is the act of denying rights and opportunities to some people, but not to others. One example of direct inequality is denying individuals the right to eat in a public restaurant based solely on the sexual orientation of those individuals. Governments that segregate schools and other public facilities based on race are an example of direct inequality.
Indirect inequality is when governments put laws in place that don't directly inhibit the rights of certain individuals, but in reality do just that. Laws that limit mail in voting and require identifying documentation in order to vote are examples of indirect inequality. Purchasing clothes made in sweatshops have the effect of supporting manufacturers who victimize their workers. You are indirectly condoning this conduct by rewarding it with sales.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about social justice, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.one-race.org/about-2 now.