It is said that spoken words have unique powers. Depending on how the words are used, the power is either positive or negative. The r word pledge was started to discourage and end the use of the term retarded or retarded in reference to persons who are intellectually impaired. This reference is hurtful and demeaning. Its avoidance makes the society more accommodating of shortcomings in other people. It shows respect and recognition of varied talents enabling people to take the right actions towards persons gifted differently.
The idea is to appreciate that each individual has unique gifts. The fact that someone cannot talk, walk or perform other duties like most people is not a reason to refer to him of her in a derogatory manner. Continued use of such words makes them part of mainstream speech. Gradually, the affected persons are isolated which affects their esteem and socialization.
The problem with the term retard/retarded is its use outside medical or clinical environment. Originally, it had a connotative meaning and was only used by doctors and nurses to refer to a clinical condition. It showed that the affected person had developmental challenges. Using it out of context makes the mentally impaired individuals to feel isolated and less valued. On the streets, it refers to a stupid or thoughtless person.
The brains behind the campaign point at the fact that regarding people as retards highlights their inability. Furthermore, this is a developmental condition and the person is able to do so many other things. The affected persons are hurt by this reference causing them to feel condemned. With pledges from millions around the world, including celebrities, business leaders and politicians, a reversal and positive outlook is being adapted.
The campaign began in 2009 at a Special Olympics activation event. There arose the need to put the person before what he or she can do. Focus was to shift from cognitive or developmental inability and shine on his intrinsic value. It was a call to appreciate that such persons have satisfying experiences like every normal human being. Words should not be used to make them appear any less human.
The pledge is posted on the website of the organization running the campaign. One is required to give the name, city and country or state of origin. You may add the name of your school or organization and your age. Your commitment will be posted on the website to boost the global campaign. You may also sign in to receive monthly updates on the latest about the campaign, events and news.
One of the phrases used in reference to people who are mentally impaired is, What is wrong with him? This campaign seeks to focus on ability. The fact that someone is using a wheelchair does not mean that he is incapable of so many things. Not everyone can run, draw, sing, swim, etc. That is not an indication of anything wrong. Mental impairment should be regarded in similar light.
There is an invitation to share personal experiences even as you pledge. These experiences are the motivation needed to make a difference. They highlight the need to make a positive change and enable the mentally impaired persons to feel dignified.
The idea is to appreciate that each individual has unique gifts. The fact that someone cannot talk, walk or perform other duties like most people is not a reason to refer to him of her in a derogatory manner. Continued use of such words makes them part of mainstream speech. Gradually, the affected persons are isolated which affects their esteem and socialization.
The problem with the term retard/retarded is its use outside medical or clinical environment. Originally, it had a connotative meaning and was only used by doctors and nurses to refer to a clinical condition. It showed that the affected person had developmental challenges. Using it out of context makes the mentally impaired individuals to feel isolated and less valued. On the streets, it refers to a stupid or thoughtless person.
The brains behind the campaign point at the fact that regarding people as retards highlights their inability. Furthermore, this is a developmental condition and the person is able to do so many other things. The affected persons are hurt by this reference causing them to feel condemned. With pledges from millions around the world, including celebrities, business leaders and politicians, a reversal and positive outlook is being adapted.
The campaign began in 2009 at a Special Olympics activation event. There arose the need to put the person before what he or she can do. Focus was to shift from cognitive or developmental inability and shine on his intrinsic value. It was a call to appreciate that such persons have satisfying experiences like every normal human being. Words should not be used to make them appear any less human.
The pledge is posted on the website of the organization running the campaign. One is required to give the name, city and country or state of origin. You may add the name of your school or organization and your age. Your commitment will be posted on the website to boost the global campaign. You may also sign in to receive monthly updates on the latest about the campaign, events and news.
One of the phrases used in reference to people who are mentally impaired is, What is wrong with him? This campaign seeks to focus on ability. The fact that someone is using a wheelchair does not mean that he is incapable of so many things. Not everyone can run, draw, sing, swim, etc. That is not an indication of anything wrong. Mental impairment should be regarded in similar light.
There is an invitation to share personal experiences even as you pledge. These experiences are the motivation needed to make a difference. They highlight the need to make a positive change and enable the mentally impaired persons to feel dignified.
About the Author:
When you are searching for the facts about the R word pledge, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://familymemberinc.org now.